...Way too expensive but wonder how it drives?
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...r=&cardist=638
Phil
...Way too expensive but wonder how it drives?
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...r=&cardist=638
Phil
Holly sh*t I always knew it was possible but didn’t think anyone would be that insane! Just imagine the weight over the front axel! The V8s have a nose-dive issue, why do you think BM stuck with the straight 6 in the M.
Id like to see some shots of the bay though!
Originally Posted by jjg43
Originally Posted by 525SEI BRIT
Don’t quote me but aprox 275 Kg for the V12 and 210 Kg for the V8 (M60)
Originally Posted by 525SEI BRIT
95 E34 530I V2.37
===========
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy
The weight of the 4.0 engine is approx the same as the 3.5 so I am not sure of what Nose Diving problem in the v-8 you guys are referring to? I get the same or better MPG than most 3.5 guys do as well - JT
Bah, I wouldn't buy it, I don't like the wing.![]()
'91 535iM - SOLD
'01 325iM - PP . SP . CWP . HK . SSK . ZHP springs . Konis . M3 strut bar . OEM sirius and aux . TMS sways
It's because the 540 is slowing down from much greater speeds due to the fantastic acceleration of the V-8....oh yeah, the bigger brakes too...Originally Posted by Johntee540
![]()
Originally Posted by DueyT
95 E34 530I V2.37
===========
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy
Shhh, Jeff...don't tell everyone else about the extra 2-3mpg we get from the Nikaject system!![]()