GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: new M5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    597

    Default new M5


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rickm
    I hope this doesn't get me in trouble, but dang is that thing ever ugly. Nice power plant though!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    479

    Default The fact that this wont be available with a transmission that

    doesn't require you to use your foot is terribly disappointing... at least give us the option.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1992 BMW 535i
    I hope this doesn't get me in trouble, but dang is that thing ever ugly. Nice power plant though!
    Yeah, I don't like the looks but that V10 would be handy. A nice 6 speed would be nice, make it a driver's car not a car for some wealthy old fart to drive to the golf course and back.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    196

    Default

    You know, I agree. I've driven bikes with sequential transmissions (remember the old Hondas?) and it takes a lot of the fun out of it. My dad has the SL55 with "manumatic" or whatever it's called, and it just doesn't give you the same control or feeling as the old clutch...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Hopefully, BMW will sell lots and lots of these suckers in the states... to wealthy idiots who can't drive... who will then total the car... leaving the engine available for sale on ebay!

    And hopefully, the engine will be able to mate up to a 6 speed manual box with little trouble, and be able to be dropped into an e34

    Custom Turbocharged 1991 535iM - 135k mi.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Man, I love the way you think. Go M5!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    333

    Default

    disgusting looks, disgusting power

    someone should put some m parallels on her

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Benneton (United Colors of)
    Posts
    3,067

    Default

    ehhh, that torque number sounds sucky. what, again, is the reason they couldn't have fitted a v8 or v12 to this car???? too much energy expended to try to be different on their parts. the RR (which i'm sure bmw had a hand in engine design of) 6.5L v8 puts out 300 ft lb at 1700 rpm (and looks like a damn m60). this car is supposed to exhibit some unkempt NVH and whatnot, its an m5. i think the 10 cyl is a terrible choice, to say nothing of the styling of the car.
    "..Torchinski v. Peterson that it is legal to carry a concealed weapon, so long the weapon is totally slick like a huge ass machine gun that you carry under a trench coat, like in the Matrix."


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    155

    Default

    After working on a V8 in the E34, I don't want to try to put a V10 in there! No space at all!
    Robert Callaway
    Dallas, TX
    '94 530im 143k mi
    '94 Land Cruiser FZJ-80 202k mi.

    "If I could have back all the time and money I ever spent on cars.......I'd spend it all on cars."

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •