WAYYY O/T but left me speachless...

[bsell]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...cle2233878.ece

Unfortunately, it is not a story in the Feb joke thread...

Brian

[whiskychaser]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...cle2233878.ece

Unfortunately, it is not a story in the Feb joke thread...

Brian

I have started a church course and I am going to do work experience helping other young mums.

Job sorted then. No worries

[Ferret]

I have started a church course and I am going to do work experience helping other young mums.

Job sorted then. No worries

Argh, this is just so WRONG - doesnt it class as statutory rape in this country (12 and 14 at the time)?
I'm quite surprised they've not had it confiscated already

PS: Welcome to the standards we have in the UK. Do my eyes decieve me or is she called chantelle? Explains a lot that does :/

[xspeedy]

Argh, this is just so WRONG - doesnt it class as statutory rape in this country (12 and 14 at the time)?
I'm quite surprised they've not had it confiscated already

PS: Welcome to the standards we have in the UK. Do my eyes decieve me or is she called chantelle? Explains a lot that does :/

I think statutory rape is only if one of them is 18 and the other is a minor (in the US at least). This is just kids going at it. Oddly enough, I think one can be seventeen and the other five and it doesn't count as statutory. What a system. Laws are goofy.

[bsell]

Argh, this is just so WRONG - doesnt it class as statutory rape in this country (12 and 14 at the time)?
I'm quite surprised they've not had it confiscated already

PS: Welcome to the standards we have in the UK. Do my eyes decieve me or is she called chantelle? Explains a lot that does :/

Help me understand how their pictures (of all three minors involved) are published in the paper...I thought it was illegal to take pictures of kids playing in the park, even your own.

In the U.S., kids' identities are proctected by the major news outlets as they are seen as too young to authorize release...

Contributing to the deliquency of two minors for the girls' parents since the boy 'spent the night [at the girl's house] regularly.' Somebody has to be the responsible party in this sad tale...

Brian

[Tiger]

I don't knoe if it is really possible. I don't think boys that young has viable sperms.

[whiskychaser]

You need a consent form signed by parents of children under 18 before photographs are taken. No doubt the parents gave their consent - the papers will have offered them some cash. The law works like this:
A boy who has sex with a girl under 16 (17 in NI) is breaking the law. Even if she agrees. If she is 13-15, the boy could go to prison for two years.
If she is under 13 he could be sentenced to life imprisonment.
A girl age 16 or over who has sex with a boy under 16 can be prosecuted for indecent assault.
These two are so young and close together in age the cops probably wont bother. The social services will have been round and if they are satisfied nothing will happen - except a load of agencies will be on the doorstep offering advice and help - like young mum's clubs, parenting skills, how to get benefits etc. And before you ask, this is 'er idoors's field of expertise - not mine.
On a postive note though, mum dad and the kid can all play with the same toys

[e34.535i.sport]

On a postive note though, mum dad and the kid can all play with the same toys

Ha ha ha LOL!

[Blitzkrieg Bob]

I don't knoe if it is really possible. I don't think boys that young has viable sperms.

I know that it would take just one look at chantelle and my sperm would become non viable

[Ken35i]

Meh those kids aren't going to have any fun in their lives for a long time. Right when they should be having fun. Sucks to be them.