GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: what do you answer to people saying rear propulsion cars suck

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    429

    Default what do you answer to people saying rear propulsion cars suck

    in a BMW context

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,561

    Default

    Rear propulsion cars. LOL. Like the Jetsons!

    Seriously, rear wheel drive cars just handle different than front wheel drive cars. Is this why some will say that rear wheel drive cars suck? Perhaps they mean in rainy, icy or snowy weather. Hard to tell from your post.
    Thanks,

    1995 525i Auto, M50TU 2.5L, EAT chip, 1/95 build, USA, 205/65/15 tires, ASC+T, HID, lumbar, EC Mirror, BMW Alpine 5 radio with BMW-Pioneer CD Changer, abt 236k miles, Oxford Green/Parchment

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    319

    Default

    depending on how technical their understanding is I would have to say that tires have X amount of grip. That grip can be used either laterally (cornering) or radially (propulsion). Driving the front wheels limits the amount of grip as it needs to be divided between turning, accelerating, and braking. It also tends to bias the vehicle weight towards the front, making a 50/50 weight distribution nearly impossible.
    A rear drive vehicle uses the front wheels predominately for turning/braking and rear wheels for accelerating/braking thus allowing more of the tires grip to be used before slip is induced.

    if they don't get it then I tell them that FWD just plain sucks, it is boring and you can't do proper donuts. FWD is great for inexperienced drivers because if you push the car too hard it will plow, let off and it is easily recovered. However it just doesn't give me the driving pleasure of RWD.

    If theire opinion of BMW rear drive is based on foul weather experience then the car was most likely not fitted with proper tires. My 5er is a blast in the snow with narrow grippy tires, forget about it with the 9" sport wheels/ all season rubber.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RallyD View Post
    My 5er is a blast in the snow with narrow grippy tires, forget about it with the 9" sport wheels/ all season rubber.
    thx all for the answers.

    what are the specs of your snow tires for the 5er?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oldham, England
    Posts
    3,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordan View Post
    what are the specs of your snow tires for the 5er?
    Same tyres as when it doesnt snow. You guys must live a long way off a bus route

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordan View Post
    what are the specs of your snow tires for the 5er?
    conti winter contact 205/60/15 on bottlecap wheels

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Northern Europe
    Posts
    191

    Default

    I saw a BMW ad once that read:

    "If you want front wheel drive, just put it in reverse."

    That should shut anyone up :-)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RallyD View Post
    If theire opinion of BMW rear drive is based on foul weather experience then the car was most likely not fitted with proper tires. My 5er is a blast in the snow with narrow grippy tires, forget about it with the 9" sport wheels/ all season rubber.

    I've ICE RACED my 5er on good winters. And blown past Scoobies in winter rally in whiteout conditions (driving via maps / timing / gps.)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oldham, England
    Posts
    3,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordan View Post
    in a BMW context
    Tell them FWD cars understeer, chew up front tyres and suffer from axle tramp. BMWs on the other hand are perfectly balanced driving machines.
    Dont mention snow though!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Chicago, Il. U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,243

    Default

    And they suck why?
    Front drive's only justification, other than packaging, is having the weight of the engine over the drive wheels for better FORWARD traction in snow. A rear drive, rear/mid engine car accomplishes the same thing with the added benefit of being able to A. Steer while drive wheels are spinning B. Control steering angle with the throttle.
    Typically these gripes come from inexperienced drivers with summer tires complaining about poor winter traction.
    If I could afford to I'd buy 'em all a Camry to shut the **** up.
    "The gas pedal wouldn't go to the floor if it weren't meant to be there"

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why do people half-ass service cars?
    By Ferret in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-07-2009, 09:48 AM
  2. Lowered cars suck
    By Anton CH. in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-03-2007, 07:30 PM
  3. People who don't deserve their cars....
    By Brian C. in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-10-2004, 10:43 PM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-01-2004, 09:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •