GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Why e34 brake life/perf better than e28?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    517

    Default Why e34 brake life/perf better than e28?

    Thinking about replacing "85 e28 535 front brakes with e34 front setup. My experience says anything but stock e28. E28 vs e34 results below.

    '85 e28 got less than 50k on new ATE rotors and Metal Masters. Pass side rotor seems to have a high spot and grooves. Did sit for about 10 months waiting for UCAs. After UCAs front susp felt like it was coming off the car. Had to replace very bad idler and worn pass tierod. Helped a lot but some rotor type shake still there.

    '89 e34 525 got 100k on same (ATE/MM) rotor and pad setup. Had bad idler and pass UCA ball joint so bad that it rattled. Little or no shake. Replaced UCAs and idler. Rotors so clean that only needed pads.

    If e28 needs rotors and pads anyway, I'd like to get performance/cost effectiveness like the e34 for the small addnl cost of calipers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic, USA
    Posts
    711

    Default

    Just a thought but sitting for ten-months does not a valid comparison make. Most rotor "warp" is not from warping but from surface problems like rust or pad goo from sitting. Couldn't really tell if you had a brake shake problem before the car sat. MM's are made in so many different countries under so many different labels you can't say for sure that the same pad material is in play on both cars even if the box is labeled the same. Also, I've had very poor luck with Ate rotors on my E28, even Brembo rotors sucked using E34 rotors and E28 M5 calipers. I'd try and stick with Balos if you can, or whatever brand come from your local BMW dealer. They always seem to work better.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    517

    Default

    BMWCCA1, thanks for the tips. Maybe e34 rotors not enough meat for those e28 M5 calipers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    517

    Default

    PADS in my "test" were PBA Metal Masters on both cars. Would expect some consistency within a single supplier. However, the original problem that led to UCA replacement on the e28 may well have been rotors.

    Shoot!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    517

    Default

    E32 seems to be the most popular replacement for e28 fronts. Would e34 work as well?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    baton rouge, loserana
    Posts
    6,922

    Default

    e32 is a thicker rotor with wider vents, e34 would also work just less of a heat sink, same sweaped area and pads
    all america wants is cold beer warm cat and a place to take a poop with a door on it

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Chicago, Il. U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,243

    Default

    50k on brakes, what's the problem?
    "The gas pedal wouldn't go to the floor if it weren't meant to be there"

Similar Threads

  1. perf chip effect on m20 525
    By [1990]525 in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-07-2007, 05:28 AM
  2. Brake Pad Life + Suspension Question
    By dave b in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 09:08 AM
  3. Is Perf Chip for M30 735 is the same for M30 730i?
    By nsbone_1988_520i in forum 7 Series BMW
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 05:23 PM
  4. Brake Life?
    By JMI in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 10:06 PM
  5. Brake pad life
    By dave b in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-02-2005, 10:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •