Hey Jeff, may want to move your own thread. We haven't figured out that 'joking' and sarcasm aren't well interpreted by all our members.............yet![]()
Charles, I wasn't trying to insult you... Simply combatting one sarcastic remark with another.Originally Posted by CharlesAFerg
With a joke like that I preceived that you were making light of my stance and intentionally mocking it at the same time. It seemed that you were inferring that I was an exteremist idiot and that nothing I say has any potential weight. If that was not your intention I am sorry for using a sarcastic tone.
I take this subject very seriously and I believe that others should too. Not saying that you don't, but thats just the message I saw. Clearly a misunderstanding. In my eyes anyway. Once again, sorry, I was not trying to alienate you.
Maybe I should just stay out of this thread since I am clearly out numbered in my views. But then again someone needs to represent the opposition. Keep it coming, I can take it.
Hey Jeff, may want to move your own thread. We haven't figured out that 'joking' and sarcasm aren't well interpreted by all our members.............yet![]()
10/90 Build 525im, 630,000+km, Eibach/Sachs, Engine Rebuild
*RIP Oskar the DOG*
I did, that's why you now have 3 ways of passing excrement. Orally, normal and new arsehole.Originally Posted by danielhstout
I don't watch ratings specials. Too much politics, too much preaching by teleprompter reading talking heads who don't truly understand what they are representing themselves as de facto experts on.Originally Posted by danielhstout
When I want facts, I read research. When I want entertainment, I watch a movie. Ted Koppel is good entertainment, but I don't like him one bit.
Well gee there sonny boy... this is what got your arse ripped. Your pathetic insistance, that because I don't believe the same thing as you or draw the same conclusions that I have not examined both sides of the issue, and Am just a person who is a political follower. As a matter of fact, you seem to include everyone who doesn't agree with you as an ignorant political follower. THAT IS IGNORANCE.Originally Posted by danielhstout
What do they teach in college today, besides remedial math, english, history, social studies, PC activism and PC "tolerance"? You really should ask for a refund if this is the best you can do after even one semester. I've draw my own mature conclusons, you disagree. Good. Get back to me after 100 years, 500 and 1000 and we will see who is right.
Researching and writing a paper is a good way of finding and organizing preexisting information. That is only step one, now you need to add information by experimentation and new discovery. Failing that you are not dealing in Hard science, only social science, or are merely an archivist.
Whatever indeed. An Apology implies behavioral correction. There has been none. So as people were once fond of saying before whiney crybabies decided tolerance meant not hurting feelings instead of accepting that tolerance MEANT hurt feelings... You can take your apology and shove it where the sun don't shine.Originally Posted by danielhstout
Last edited by attack eagle; 12-11-2006 at 10:12 PM.
i see this and pm'd the involved to edit their threads, if it continues I will clean it myself. Good threads gone awry...
Originally Posted by Dave M
95 E34 530I V2.37
===========
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy
Over here in England, there has been a big increase in wind tubines, which obviously is a good thing. However the downside to them is their cost and people's opposition to them, mainly rural communities who would otherwise get lumbered with a massive wind farm on an area of outstanding beauty. We need to strike some sort of balance now for this to work. Personally I would never oppose a wind turbine, and would happily have one of my own to put in the back garden, but as yet there is no government incentives to do so, even though I live on a hill and there's always a good wind blowing!
It's aworld!
Cheers,
Shaun M
There is a good number of used wind/energy systems out there if you are really interested. You'd be surprised of the decent gear that gets tossed in favor of brand new gov't cheese funded systems. Also, if you bypass Amarillo heading to Austin from Denver, you will drive by couple thousand acres of wind farm, and they are truly majestic and peaceful pieces of collossal machinery to behold...a boon to the landscape. Frankly I'd like to see a few thousand wind towers off the coast of the vinyard, if the righteous senator would allow it. Texas not only refines the most petrol energy, they are fast becoming the largest producer of all energy sources including wind, water, and sun. We sure are a bunch of backwoods rednecks arent' we daniel?Originally Posted by E34-520iSE
My next $$$ investment is in PVBM...google that whydoncha?
~6 speed~ Rear Fogs ~ Shadowline ~ Tow Package ~ OEMMM///S38B38
GE has a huge contract with china to supply the newest type of high efficient generators. google that whydoncha
Originally Posted by 530iTouring
95 E34 530I V2.37
===========
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy
tax credits on your existing owed taxes which is why big oil and various light and gas companies are going to windpower even in locations that aren't optimal, credits that directly offset taxes owed on their other business dealings. The state levels are where the real incentives to small producers are. To bad solar isn't getting the same kind of incentives/credits/funding or hybrid vehicles, instead of losing their tax credits gaining more tax credits.
And the Senator isn't the one who's going to kill the windfarm off the vinyard, Its a republican rep. from Alaska who's going to kill it. With his proposal to ban windfarms within a 1.5 nautical mile range of shipping or ferry lanes. Its pretty much already a given in fact.
Originally Posted by 530iTouring
bookends since State of Fear is a FICTIONAL novel written by someone who has no expertise in the field whatsoever, should stick to his Tv show ER.
Whereas Inconvenient Truth is a documentary based on the most current available science who's statements and claims are for the most part in complete agreement with 99% of the reputable climatology experts out there.
Originally Posted by Dash01
AlGore's climatology forecasting and modeling are 99% speculative....that is to say as fictional as anything Michael Crichton or Dan Brown could speculate in their novels for that matter.
regarding pinning the Massachusett's wind farm failure on an Alaskan senator, I can only say how convenient![]()
~6 speed~ Rear Fogs ~ Shadowline ~ Tow Package ~ OEMMM///S38B38