GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: ::.. Sunoco 94 vs Everyone Else 91

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    T·O·R·O·N·T·O
    Posts
    3,011

    Default ::.. Sunoco 94 vs Everyone Else 91

    ::.. Sunoco 94 vs Everyone Else 91

    M30, sharked. Run usually Petro Canada 91 because I have the CitiMC to save sc per litre. Yeah, with such a large tank, it adds up! Anyway... has anyone switched from 91 to 94 and noticed an appreciable difference? Given the price is not just the difference but an additional 2c (plus PetroPoints) per litre, I'm hesitant to try it out... for now. I get enough quickie Ultra Washes and other junk using their points so there is added value. Again unless it's an appreciable difference (perhaps in rev climb, or smoothing), then I won't bother thinking about it again.
    :: HIDCanada.com | Illuminating Your World


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,839

    Default

    well, if its "upgraded" with ethanol to get the higher octane, dont use it.
    Alusil, Dinan DME | ITG Air Filter | Eibach/Bilstein HD | 26/20 Swaybars | Iridium plugs | Depo/ProLumen HID | Optima batt. | no AC | Stoptech brake lines, Frozen rotors, brass bushings, Superblue

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    T·O·R·O·N·T·O
    Posts
    3,011

    Default

    This is interesting... though dated...
    http://www.ftc.gov/opa/predawn/F93/sunoco.htm

    Sun Company, Inc., and its subsidiary, Sun Refining and
    Marketing Company, both of Philadelphia, have agreed to settle
    Federal Trade Commission charges that they claimed Sunoco high-
    octane Ultra 93.5 and Ultra 94 gasolines are superior to other
    gasolines in providing engine power and acceleration, but did not
    have a reasonable basis to back up these representations. The
    proposed settlement agreement would prohibit any future unsub-
    stantiated engine-performance claims for Sunoco gasolines.
    According to the FTC's complaint, issued simultaneously with
    the proposed consent agreement to settle the charges, advertise-
    ments for Ultra 93.5 and 94 gasolines made the following state-
    ments:
    -- No other gasoline can give your car better acceleration.
    Because no other gasoline has 94 octane; and
    -- Because no other gasoline has 94 octane - the highest
    octane under the sun....Don't waste your time going anywhere
    else. Come to Sunoco and fill up with Ultra 94 - for
    maximum power and performance.
    Anyway, I'd believe Ultra 94 contains MBTE and oxygenated fuel. Wonder if that still holds true. Maybe I'll just run 91 at Petro and mix in some Toluene instead
    :: HIDCanada.com | Illuminating Your World


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    805

    Default

    I used to run BP's 91 octane, switch to Sunoco's 94 octane. The car did feel smoother on idle, and a bit more acceleration. IMHO though, its hard to compare before and after effects based on just switching gas (as far as acceleration goes). I feel as if its hard to distinguish actual performance gain vs. placebo effect...
    Rondell 58's|Eibach Springs|B&B Tri-Flow Exhaust|Shadowline|S/D Rotors|KYB Struts



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,839

    Default

    remember, unless the car is tuned for higher octane, it will actually have the same or less power, not more. i guess sunco didnt get that memo.
    Alusil, Dinan DME | ITG Air Filter | Eibach/Bilstein HD | 26/20 Swaybars | Iridium plugs | Depo/ProLumen HID | Optima batt. | no AC | Stoptech brake lines, Frozen rotors, brass bushings, Superblue

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Sunoco stopped selling 94 Octane around here in NJ 2 months ago. I never thought the extra 10 cents for 1 point of octane was worth even trying.
    I use 93 usually and occaisionally 91, I notice quicker starts with 93 and maybe a bit smoother running.

    I still won't buy anything from Mobil-Exxon so around here it's Sunoco, Citgo, Shell, Getty and a few new ones I have no idea who they are.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    5,403

    Default

    Using a higher octane fuel than what is required by manufacturer will gain you guys NOTHING. High octane fuel doesn't add power, it more or less takes away heat and less likely to detonate due to higher burn point. If the car is tuned for 91, 93 wont do anything more for ya. Same with 94. You can run race gas if you want, it'll just smell funny.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    520

    Default

    I always used sunoco 94 in my jetta vr6 - tuned with chip, bored throttle body, intake... it was better, but temperature and humidity also played a huge role in my area, stinky hot days, the car is a dog!

    No more sunoco in quebec, it is top notch fuel though.
    Not like the ******** petro can 94.
    ^°^ ><((({º>°°

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon K
    Using a higher octane fuel than what is required by manufacturer will gain you guys NOTHING. High octane fuel doesn't add power, it more or less takes away heat and less likely to detonate due to higher burn point. If the car is tuned for 91, 93 wont do anything more for ya. Same with 94. You can run race gas if you want, it'll just smell funny.
    You are correct, I use 91 as required, have tried 93 with NO appreciable gains.
    (transposed my numbers)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    T·O·R·O·N·T·O
    Posts
    3,011

    Default

    Given the compression ratio, I'd reckon the m30 in 535i would optimize at about 92-93ish being sharked.
    :: HIDCanada.com | Illuminating Your World


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •