Only had 35k miles on it and was in very nice shape. I have read that some years have an oil consumption problem. What years are the good ones or the ones to stay away from?
Big, Big Time Poster
Drove a 2000 M5 today.
Only had 35k miles on it and was in very nice shape. I have read that some years have an oil consumption problem. What years are the good ones or the ones to stay away from?
Ted K
90 535 5-speed
Grand Master
The earliest production ones....
had oval piston rings I believe. These early production motors were the ones that used a lot of oil. I used to know the production date, but it eludes me right now. I want to say up until 6/01.
Originally Posted by Ted K
Grand Master
i believe the 2000's had vanos problems too.
www.KaRealtySF.com
Build Date: 05-1995 /Engine: m50tu /Automatic Transmission /ABS /NO ASC /Open Differential /EAT Chip
Grand Master
Not just any oil mind you...
...expensive BMW synthetic oil!
Bellevue WA
90 535iM - not much stock remains. 3.7 liters, ported head, cammed, 3.73 diffy, M5 brakes, MAFed, yadda yadda yadda
86 Porsche 951 - Track Toy
Big, Big Time Poster
Yes it was nice. Totally a different ride and handling then my tweaked 535. When I drove away in my car my son said Dad your car really goes pretty good too. Have not made a decision yet but I am going to keep looking. Mt son did say think what we could do if we put a turbo on yours!
Ted K
90 535 5-speed
Grand Master
Can you describe how it was different?
Dinan chip, Bilstein sports w H&R, RD sways, RD strut brace, 750 bushings, Zimmermans/MetalMasters, O.E. M Pars, Eisenmann muffler
Major Contributor
If I had that much money, I would rather buy a '95 3.8l E34 M5 and turbo charge it. Just my point of view.
BMW E34 528i, M52B28 + M50 manifold, Remus exhaust, ///M Parallel Spoke 18" rims
Grand Master
they have clutch probs i hear
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote