GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Pics of springs install

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Denasti
    ...Plus the 18's do fill the front fenders up nicely without a drop...
    18" wheels (inc tyres) should not 'fill the front fenders up' any more or less than 15"s, 16"s or 17"s etc. If they do then your tyres are incorrect. The overall diameter of any wheels (inc tyres) should remain the same regardless of rim size or they will alter the vehicles gearing and possibly cause other problems such as rubbing. Visually, larger rims may appear to fill out your fenders but in reality only lowering your suspension will do that.

    1990 E34 535iA, 215,000kms (130,000 miles).
    Dual Climate, Rear Headrests, Rollerblind, M-Tech Wheel,
    Memory Seats, EAT Chip, T-Stars.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Looks great. How is the ride? What size rims aer on both cars. Are mikes 17 and yours 18?
    Ted K
    90 535 5-speed

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, TX
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lowell
    Seems like yours went a bit lower, though -- was it because you used the 3mm spring pads versus Mike using stockers (or did he do the same thing?)
    Actually we both used the same springs and same 4mm pads. I thought mine looked lower too, but it's just because of the color I guess. Measuring the front and rear bumpers both cars are withing 1/8" of each other.

    Quote Originally Posted by mattyb
    was it only the front u changed or all round. do these springs come in other sizes or is that what they are?specific to that one product size?
    We did all four on each car. If you look closesly at his before and after you can see the back is down slightly also. As far as I know Vogtland makes two sets of springs for these cars, these and some called "audio" springs. They are supposed to be stiffer for people with lots of audio weight in their trunk.

    Quote Originally Posted by infinity5
    hmm. wow, i've never seen a before and after shot like that. i don't know if i like how unlevel the car looks. yikes. I guess it only makes sense, but the contrast is sharp.
    We both like it, but we both come from muscle car background and that's the look we are used to with a little rake.

    1988 M3 - Track rat
    1989 325iC
    1995 530iM
    2000 323iT - UUC BBK, PSS9 Coilovers
    2005 GMC HD Crew

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, TX
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Denasti
    Yeah it looks good, but I cannot believe he has rubbing issues with that much room and you don't.
    I don't know if he does, I on the other hand am rubbing slightly when I pull in my driveway, other than that no issues.

    Quote Originally Posted by Denasti
    Lots of pot holes and dirt roads here in texas.
    Hey, I live in Texas, I just don't drive on dirt roads

    1988 M3 - Track rat
    1989 325iC
    1995 530iM
    2000 323iT - UUC BBK, PSS9 Coilovers
    2005 GMC HD Crew

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, TX
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted K
    Looks great. How is the ride? What size rims aer on both cars. Are mikes 17 and yours 18?
    Mike's is running 17x8.5" all the way around with 225/45 on the front and 245/45 on the rear.

    I have 18x8.5" all the way around with 245/40's on all 4 corners.

    I got to hit some corners tonight on my way home from hockey. Car is so much more fun to drive now. I hear everyone on here talking about how great these cars handle, but mine always felt big and heavy since I'm used to my e30. Now it feels much nicer around the corners and even running 90-100 down the highway feels smoother.

    1988 M3 - Track rat
    1989 325iC
    1995 530iM
    2000 323iT - UUC BBK, PSS9 Coilovers
    2005 GMC HD Crew

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    114

    Default

    i read in the instruction manual that these cars have 50/50 weight dist.

    Black/Black '90 535IM..... '65 Cal look vw bug

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,825

    Default

    brodee, do you know how much your wheels/tires weigh? or wheels and tires seperately?...did you notice any negative effects after installing your upgraded rims/tires?

    www.KaRealtySF.com
    Build Date: 05-1995 /Engine: m50tu /Automatic Transmission /ABS /NO ASC /Open Differential /EAT Chip

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, TX
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liquidtiger720
    brodee, do you know how much your wheels/tires weigh? or wheels and tires seperately?...did you notice any negative effects after installing your upgraded rims/tires?
    No clue, I'll try to weigh one the next time I have them off. I know they are heavy. Didn't really notice much difference in performance or handling, but I don't pus this car that hard either.

    On my e30 I switched from 16" t-star replicas that were HEAVY to my 15" Kosei K1's for track and can feel a huge difference in acceleration and response, but it is a lighter car and has the m20 in it.

    1988 M3 - Track rat
    1989 325iC
    1995 530iM
    2000 323iT - UUC BBK, PSS9 Coilovers
    2005 GMC HD Crew

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Woodlands, TX
    Posts
    6

    Default

    I guess it's time for me to chime in. I had register first.

    My car does have a rake to it. I don't mind it though. Gives it that drag look that Thad (Brodee) mentioned. I think that part of the rake is from the staggered tire size (245 rear and 225 front). These tires have different heights and I'm not sure yet how substantial.

    As you can see from my before and after pics, the gap in the front was HUGE. The rear was not that bad. When I first put these rims/tires on I could not stand how they looked with the vehicle at stock height.

    The tires rubbed on the driver's side front and driver's side rear going over dips in the road and making right hand turns. At first I though that me being about 230lbs was causing this.
    However my driver's side front fender has some damage and it puts the lip of it closer to the tire. So I took a rubber mallet and gently massaged it. I also found a rubber clip on the inside of the fender (maybe to hold the inner fender well?) which had tire marks on it. So I removed it and the inner fender is still secure. On the rear I used a vise grip to carefully fold the edges of the fender lip (which look to have been rolled by the factoryin the top center area).

    Now it rides and handles great without running. Going over a severe dip in the road at high speeds will cause a slight rub from the rear, but it did that before I put the springs on too. I also don't like the way the car feels going over parking lot speed bumps. This could be from worn out OEM 220K miles shocks.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brodee
    No clue, I'll try to weigh one the next time I have them off. I know they are heavy. Didn't really notice much difference in performance or handling, but I don't pus this car that hard either.

    On my e30 I switched from 16" t-star replicas that were HEAVY to my 15" Kosei K1's for track and can feel a huge difference in acceleration and response, but it is a lighter car and has the m20 in it.
    The standardfactory basketweaves will be lighter than almost any aftermarket wheels unless you're spending big dollars to buy ultra light weight forged rims. So in reality most who fit aftermarket wheels are actually downgrading the performance of their E34's. Apart from the benefit of reduced sidewall roll of lower profile tyres on larger diameter rims, acceleration, braking and handling in general (especially over uneven surfaces) will be worsened by fitting wheels that weight more the the standard wheels. And most do weigh more... in many cases a LOT more!

    So for most of us it's a classic case of fashion over function which I find somewhat ironic as we all marvel at the technical excellence of the E34 and then do our best to stuff it by worsening the original engineering!

    1990 E34 535iA, 215,000kms (130,000 miles).
    Dual Climate, Rear Headrests, Rollerblind, M-Tech Wheel,
    Memory Seats, EAT Chip, T-Stars.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Cold Air intake install (with pics)
    By BigKriss in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 02-14-2007, 05:40 PM
  2. 2002 528i Avic-Z1 double din install pics.
    By gmannino in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 08:17 PM
  3. any e32 pics with H&R springs?
    By nsbone_1988_520i in forum 7 Series BMW
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-25-2005, 04:37 PM
  4. Work pics- M-Tech install is on!
    By genphreak in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-24-2005, 06:20 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-04-2004, 12:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •