GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: 3.46lsd to 3.64lsd worth while?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    113

    Default

    I think I'm going with a 3.91 lsd. If it's to much of a difference (don't think it will be, sounds like it'll make the gears about as short as my e30's were, which I would love to have) I'll probably swap it out in a few more months for a 3.73 or 3.64, but I don't really mind the gas mileage decrease (I used to be concerned about gas mileage, but meh, life's too short) and like I said I don't mind shorter gears.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,843

    Default Wtf

    okay man...your right, a .064 increase must be very noticable. Thats a whopping 192 rpm increase at 3000 rpms. To take it a step farther its 320 rpms at 5k. Your tha man.

    Quote Originally Posted by bahnstormer
    wtf are u talking about? have u done this swap?
    its a HUGE difference. every gear feels like a passing gear

    i went from 3.46open to 3.64lsd

    its worth it, come drive my car dude and u can see for yourself.

    as far as what u should do, i believe in suspension tires then go fast for the
    mod work
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Central NJ - USA
    Posts
    1,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 632 Regal
    okay man...your right, a .064 increase must be very noticable. Thats a whopping 192 rpm increase at 3000 rpms. To take it a step farther its 320 rpms at 5k. Your tha man.

    regal, what are u talking about? we are talking about drivability and feel
    not how many rpms it goes up.
    u have not a clue as to what u're saying and u're being an ass about it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,843

    Default I am an ass...

    thats not the issue, that small of an increase would not make enough difference to feel. RPMs is exactly the thing were talking about too because thats the only change being made. I dont know what im talking about??? LMAO.

    Quote Originally Posted by bahnstormer
    regal, what are u talking about? we are talking about drivability and feel
    not how many rpms it goes up.
    u have not a clue as to what u're saying and u're being an ass about it.
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    835

    Default Again, there's a very noticeable improvement with the 3.64 gearset.

    Quote Originally Posted by 632 Regal
    thats not the issue, that small of an increase would not make enough difference to feel. RPMs is exactly the thing were talking about too because thats the only change being made. I dont know what im talking about??? LMAO.
    Maybe it is because we are making the changes on cars with manual transmissions, as the difference is substantial when driving around town.

    Bahn, maybe we should swap in some torque convertors for a more involving drive?
    erased due to slander

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 632 Regal
    thats not the issue, that small of an increase would not make enough difference to feel. RPMs is exactly the thing were talking about too because thats the only change being made. I dont know what im talking about??? LMAO.
    But remember its not about the rpm inrease - it's about the fact that the engine doesn't have to use as much power-per-rpm to turn the wheels, so more is free'd up.

    3.64 WILL be a difference, especially in a 5 speed. Look at this

    Getrag 260/6

    1st 3.83
    2nd 2.2
    3rd 1.4
    4th 1.0
    5th 0.81
    Rev 3.46

    That's the transmission ratio - are you saying that the fourth to fifth ratio difference won't do anything? Becuase that .19 ratio difference DOES make a difference, as does the .18 difference between the 3.46 and 3.64...

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Central NJ - USA
    Posts
    1,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin in Bellevue
    Maybe it is because we are making the changes on cars with manual transmissions, as the difference is substantial when driving around town.

    Bahn, maybe we should swap in some torque convertors for a more involving drive?

    actually i did a diff swap in my sisters 90 535ia and went from a 3.91 to a 4.27 (iirc) and that made a difference for sure...however i wouldn't say it
    is as noticeable as it is on my car.....perhaps b/c i don't drive her car enough...

    a torque convertor + a flux capacitator should make our cars fly

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,843

    Default ok,

    1st 3.83 = 4.075
    2nd 2.2 = 2.34
    3rd 1.4 = 1.49
    4th 1.0 = 1.064
    5th 0.81 = 0.86
    Rev 3.46 = 3.64

    your thinking is not correct, the upgrade is .064 not .19, unless I really dont know what I'm talking about divide 3.64 by 3.46...I appologize if not correct here but I think I am.

    I think Im real confused now.
    Last edited by 632 Regal; 05-15-2005 at 01:59 PM.
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 632 Regal
    1st 3.83 = 4.075
    2nd 2.2 = 2.34
    3rd 1.4 = 1.49
    4th 1.0 = 1.064
    5th 0.81 = 0.86
    Rev 3.46 = 3.64

    your thinking is not correct, the upgrade is .064 not .19, unless I really dont know what I'm talking about divide 3.64 by 3.46...I appologize if not correct here but I think I am.

    I think Im real confused now.
    The way I put it is the difference between each ratio by subtracting, not find a percentage. Either way it doesn't matter - when a bunch of people say it makes a difference - and they actually DID the mod, I have to believe them

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by epj3
    The way I put it is the difference between each ratio by subtracting, not find a percentage. Either way it doesn't matter - when a bunch of people say it makes a difference - and they actually DID the mod, I have to believe them
    I did a 3.46 LSD - 3.91 LSD swap, BIG MISTAKE, HUGE.......way tooooooo short. a 3.64 or 3.73 is the way to go.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is this worth it?
    By sirius_GTO in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 02:39 AM
  2. What do you think this is worth?
    By magnum in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2005, 10:39 PM
  3. Installing my 3.64LSD *pics*
    By bahnstormer in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-03-2005, 11:05 AM
  4. The 3.64lsd needs the front flange swapped.
    By Martin in Bellevue in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-04-2004, 10:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •