GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: OK you MAF and ECU hackers - what do you make of this?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,640

    Default OK you MAF and ECU hackers - what do you make of this?

    My car is pulling about 15 to 18 more HP (repeatedly) when I disconnect the WOT wire from the ECU. This is with the MAF setup...

    Measured with a G-tech Pro. Back to back tests, same road with no more than 30 minutes separation.

    Interesting, huh?

    Disclaimer: Mess with your own car at your own risk. I can't tell you what your AFM based car will do if you pull the wire. Yer on yer own.
    Last edited by Jeff N.; 04-08-2005 at 01:07 AM.
    Bellevue WA
    90 535iM - not much stock remains. 3.7 liters, ported head, cammed, 3.73 diffy, M5 brakes, MAFed, yadda yadda yadda
    86 Porsche 951 - Track Toy

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    445

    Default

    Yeah, fascinating!. Maybe the Germans wanted to richen the mixture at WOT to preserve the reliability of the engine. Did you, by any chance measure the lean/stoic/rich mixture at WOT ?.
    My M20 engine with modified APEXI SAFC maintains some richness at WOT. I could lean it out a bit but does not really help much.

    Which pin on the ECU is wot ?.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bethlehem, PA
    Posts
    661

    Default

    Do you have more information on your AFM-MAF conversion? I'm interested in doing something like that.

    Concering the WOT wire, are you talking about the WOT signal from the throttle position switch? You don't happen to know your switch part number by any chance? It's easy to read the p/n on the front of the switch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    835

    Default Since disconnecting WOT lead from tps, the narrow o2 sensor will read rich.

    The split second o2 gauge will now show rich under full throttle. It didn't, with the WOT sensed from the tps. If fact, the 2 middle maf pots are right where this can be leaned back to dithering o2 readings with small adjustments. I guess this means it may be leaner than best for acceleration.

    It did pass the WA state emissions test yesterday morning. In fact, the numbers were better than the test from 2003. This is with the cam, new valve seals, & maf. Oh yeah, and 21lb injectors.
    Last edited by Martin in Bellevue; 04-08-2005 at 09:31 AM.
    erased due to slander

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,640

    Default

    Martin - disconnecting the WOT wire with no other change and going richer makes sense (I think). The chip wizards tend to lean out the mixture to gain power.

    Here's (again-I think), where this is going:

    - when the ECU sees WOT, it ignores the voltage signal from the air meter
    - the injector pulse, ignition advance is based only a value determined by engine RPM
    - the MAF is essentially ignored at this point

    Soooo...I thinking the "problem" is along these lines.

    - the WOT tables in the JC chip really not very optomized for my engine setup and somehow the combination of the voltage signals from the MAF and the midrange tables do a better job
    - Mark D would have to comment on how the ECU tables handle lookups of injector and advance settings when MAF voltage tends towards the upper limits (4.7 or 4.8 if I recall).
    Bellevue WA
    90 535iM - not much stock remains. 3.7 liters, ported head, cammed, 3.73 diffy, M5 brakes, MAFed, yadda yadda yadda
    86 Porsche 951 - Track Toy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    indiana
    Posts
    115

    Default Oh My God - Jeff Nord Lives!!!!!

    MIRICLES never cease.
    JoeS
    _____________________________________________

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Is it possible that you are already at an AF ratio that produces maximum torque and the additional fuel added by the DME at WOT is making mixture excessively rich, resulting in less power?

    Paul Shovestul



    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff N.
    Martin - disconnecting the WOT wire with no other change and going richer makes sense (I think). The chip wizards tend to lean out the mixture to gain power.

    Here's (again-I think), where this is going:

    - when the ECU sees WOT, it ignores the voltage signal from the air meter
    - the injector pulse, ignition advance is based only a value determined by engine RPM
    - the MAF is essentially ignored at this point

    Soooo...I thinking the "problem" is along these lines.

    - the WOT tables in the JC chip really not very optomized for my engine setup and somehow the combination of the voltage signals from the MAF and the midrange tables do a better job
    - Mark D would have to comment on how the ECU tables handle lookups of injector and advance settings when MAF voltage tends towards the upper limits (4.7 or 4.8 if I recall).
    .....Got to keep the loonies on the paath.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    baton rouge, loserana
    Posts
    6,922

    Default

    that's something i may try on my 535 afm'd 325is, i still have a lean problem on the top end, and sometimes at lower rpms when i hammer it at around 3k rpm it goes lean for a second or three. dammit i need a ams conversion, i tweek and tune and a week later the sob has adjusted and leaned out, i had it running like a bat outta hell a couple weeks ago and now it's leaning out again
    all america wants is cold beer warm cat and a place to take a poop with a door on it

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,235

    Default Hook up that wideband O2 sensor!

    I think you're probably right about the WOT map not being set up right. IIRC, the DME dumps in a bit more fuel (~10%) to give you an A/F ratio closer to 13 at WOT, as opposed to 14.7 everywhere else.

    It would be most helpful to see that wideband O2 reading in the two different cases. You could also have an O2 sensor on it's way out and setting the mixture rich all the time, so that you're too rich once the WOT map kicks in.

    How do you like the G-Tech meter? Does it record RPM too or just use accelerometers to estimate velocity?
    Robin

    72 Chevy K10
    01 E39 M5

Similar Threads

  1. Does anyone make something like this for the E34 ?
    By Sidney Rough-Diamond in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 09:13 PM
  2. I think I'm the first to make it....
    By Messerschmitt in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-25-2005, 03:26 PM
  3. IBUS Lcd hackers
    By netmgr in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-18-2004, 07:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •