Strut Brace -- Take a look
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...Pr3_PcY_BIN_IT
I bought one of these strut braces and it came yesterday. Quality looks great and I don't anticipate any fit problems as it sat right on the bolts. I'm going to install this afternoon but wanted to pass this on to you guys.
The price seems right to me.
Actually any brace that's not tied to the firewall is not......
substantially effective......but I hear what you are saying about the "adjustable" ones.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRR2
That looks a LOT more substantial than most of them. You have to laugh at those that have massive bars and mounting plates, then have a 1/4" threaded "adjuster" at one end. I don't recall whose was like that, but I think it was one of the 'name' brands. Ridiculous. I wonder how much the bow in the brace reduces the stiffness. Too bad the engine and hood placement prevents using a perfectly straight brace.
What do you expect this thing to do for you? Do you autocross the car or something where that little bit of extra rigidity will make a difference?
I'm sorry....you're right....
both strut towers can move together in unison.....a perfect strut bar!
I wasn't justifying anything, you took my post to mean something it did not. I never told anyone not to get one.
I was merely stating the fact that without tying it in to the firewall, it's not attached to a more fixed position.....therefor you're still losing the full intended rigidity/stiffness achieved by using a strut bar in the first place. The idea is to get rid of any movement at all, not just side to side movement, but up and down as well....how do you think this happens?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1.../temp/ad7a.jpg
The addition of a tower to tower brace is noticeable, but not 100% effective. When you say steering response, what do you mean? Initial turn in? Structural stability maintained through hard cornering so that any flex is not affecting camber? I maintain that the strut tower brace on my M5 with has done nothing to initial turn in(camber plates have though) but has helped with lateral stability and tracking in high speed cornering....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin8r
Not true. The idea is to try to minimize the movement between the two shock towers. A straight bar between them would be ideal. A "bowed" bar is less than perfect, but still far better than none at all. And there is a discernable "tightening up" of the steering response and feel when running a strut tower brace even carving through canyon roads, let alone race track, time attack (might be doing some next week at Cal Speedway...) or autocross. Besides, a lot of the things we enthusiasts do to our cars cannot nor should not be justified using the "need" standard... just my .02....