GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: quick ... temperature sensor fooling

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    834

    Default quick ... temperature sensor fooling

    Hi guys, I remember once there was a thread here and MarkD told about adding a resistor to the temperature sensor to change the fuel mixture. I need a quick tip of how to fool this sensor to pinpoint an emission problem in my engine. thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    9,250

    Default Gale did this on his 735

    I quote:
    Finally spliced & hardwired the 100 resistor under the boot of the DME temp sensor connector. I am pleased with the smoother idle the +100 ohms gives it. I tried 150 ohms & the idle was smoother yet but it had flat spots under acceleration at higher rpm's. The +100 ohms gives a noticable performance increase and along with the .011", idle is quite nice, no Lexus mind you but still very smooth with minimal dropping of a cyl now & then.

    DME temp sensor resistor, 100 ohm x 1 watt, metal film type resistor (less sensitive to temp variations than the old carbon resistors):

    The boot conceals the resistor completely:

    Temporary test resistor setup:


    Lately, I revisited the DME temp sensor and found that it reads out of range when hot, to the point that the fuel mixture is excessively leaned out causing it to stumble. It reads 178 ohms at operating temp (approx. 180F). Bentley says it should measure 270-400 ohms at operating temp, so I put a 100 ohm resistor in series with the sensor connector to put it at 278 ohms. It made a noticeable improvement in idle quality and helped thru-out the rpm range to make the engine rev more smoothly and feel a tiny bit extra power. I tried a 150 ohm resistor & it helped the idle even more but caused flat spots under hard acceleration & felt like it reduced power, so I'm going to splice & hardwire the 100 ohm resistor under the boot after it's due for the bi-annual emmissions test in November.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    834

    Default

    that sounds cool ... I will go test it now ... I will tell you what happens. thanks allot for this precious information.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Split, Croatia
    Posts
    718

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shogun
    I quote:
    Finally spliced & hardwired the 100 resistor under the boot of the DME temp sensor connector. I am pleased with the smoother idle the +100 ohms gives it. I tried 150 ohms & the idle was smoother yet but it had flat spots under acceleration at higher rpm's. The +100 ohms gives a noticable performance increase and along with the .011", idle is quite nice, no Lexus mind you but still very smooth with minimal dropping of a cyl now & then.
    I presume this works only with M30 engines with AFM? How about M50 with MAF?
    BMW E34 528i, M52B28 + M50 manifold, Remus exhaust, ///M Parallel Spoke 18" rims

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Conceptually this will work with any engine, whether there is any improvement in an M50 remains to be seen. It can be done with intake air temp sensor sensor also, at least on cars with AFM. I've read different opinions on whether MFM equipped engines use intake air temp sensor for cold start enrichment or just for knock control. In the early '80's we would wire 2K ohm potentiometers in series with intake air temp sensor to make mixture "adjustable" from drivers seat. Both techniques fool the DME into thinking engine or outside air temp is cooler then actual and richens mixture. This was a dealer installed fix for cold start driveability complaints in 60-70F weather in early motronic BMW's, using a 270 ohm resistor IIRC. I'm certain there's a SIB on it. It's also possible that these modifications are temporary until the adaption algorthims in DME figure out something's changed.

    Paul Shovestul


    Quote Originally Posted by Interceptor
    I presume this works only with M30 engines with AFM? How about M50 with MAF?
    .....Got to keep the loonies on the paath.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,150

    Default I think you're missing the point that Gale did it to try to correct a

    faulty dme temp sensor, he was trying to put it within the range of a good one.... and by doing this to a good sensor it looks like your fooling it by what 25%? This may just make it stay in open loop continually which would be a not so good idea. If you're trying to correct a rough idle why not just adjust the idle air bypass on the afm to make it as rich as possible and still stay within the allowable limits of the dme? And the resistor fix that Paul is talking about was to fix a known problem, bmw corrected this on the later models of e28's but you still see people on ebay selling these things...









    Quote Originally Posted by shogun
    I quote:
    Finally spliced & hardwired the 100 resistor under the boot of the DME temp sensor connector. I am pleased with the smoother idle the +100 ohms gives it. I tried 150 ohms & the idle was smoother yet but it had flat spots under acceleration at higher rpm's. The +100 ohms gives a noticable performance increase and along with the .011", idle is quite nice, no Lexus mind you but still very smooth with minimal dropping of a cyl now & then.

    DME temp sensor resistor, 100 ohm x 1 watt, metal film type resistor (less sensitive to temp variations than the old carbon resistors):

    The boot conceals the resistor completely:

    Temporary test resistor setup:


    Lately, I revisited the DME temp sensor and found that it reads out of range when hot, to the point that the fuel mixture is excessively leaned out causing it to stumble. It reads 178 ohms at operating temp (approx. 180F). Bentley says it should measure 270-400 ohms at operating temp, so I put a 100 ohm resistor in series with the sensor connector to put it at 278 ohms. It made a noticeable improvement in idle quality and helped thru-out the rpm range to make the engine rev more smoothly and feel a tiny bit extra power. I tried a 150 ohm resistor & it helped the idle even more but caused flat spots under hard acceleration & felt like it reduced power, so I'm going to splice & hardwire the 100 ohm resistor under the boot after it's due for the bi-annual emmissions test in November.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,150

    Default Since a number of you will probably do this whether its a good idea or not here's the

    temp /resistance numbers for it, I'm going to assume that its linear so you can draw out your own graph and get the numbers at realistic operating temps and determine how much you want to change it.. Keep in mind that the dme uses this temp info to help protect the engine, when the temps get extreme besides turning the aux fan on they also richen the mixture and retard the timing typically to help protect the motor.. by altering this you may fool this feature.











    Quote Originally Posted by Bill R.
    faulty dme temp sensor, he was trying to put it within the range of a good one.... and by doing this to a good sensor it looks like your fooling it by what 25%? This may just make it stay in open loop continually which would be a not so good idea. If you're trying to correct a rough idle why not just adjust the idle air bypass on the afm to make it as rich as possible and still stay within the allowable limits of the dme? And the resistor fix that Paul is talking about was to fix a known problem, bmw corrected this on the later models of e28's but you still see people on ebay selling these things...


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    834

    Default

    I have something here ... I measured the resistance on the temp. sensor when the engine was a bit warm it read 680 ohms. is that within the range? I'm trying here to decrease the mixture concentration by adj. the temp. sensor. I also need to know if the AFM voltage should be around 1.25v at idle? I already added the 100 ohms for test this week to see how much carbon will be emitted.
    one last things I measured the spark plugs wires and it read 6K ohms some were 5.8 some were 6.2 ... any ideas here?
    Last edited by grave77; 02-16-2005 at 10:24 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. On board computer temperature sensor
    By Kibokojoe in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-24-2007, 08:21 AM
  2. Temperature sensor ohm reading
    By Kibokojoe in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 09:02 AM
  3. Hyperactive temperature sensor?
    By DanH in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-11-2004, 07:16 PM
  4. Temperature Sensor
    By ivenos in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2004, 07:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •