Bill, if you read the thread, you will notice that Rick came swaggering in and wished to pursue an arguement in a rather rude manner. His rudeness was met in kind by my response. Of course you chose to degrade if further by refering to me as a "****". I guess when your not happy, you go around calling people names. I hate to tell you, but your calling me a "****" does nothing but show that you have some issues. I would guess that you are about 25 and not really yet secure with who you are. Don't worry, some kids, some age, and you will grow out of it.
Addressing your comment about flash point here is some more language describing what the NOACK Volitility Test (ASTM-5800) is:
"Volatility is measured by the principal, European test called NOACK, is the amount of oil lost (the light molecules) over time at a given temperature and pressure. It has a direct impact on high temperature engine oil effectiveness -- especially on viscosity, emissions and oil consumption. Today's oils have a NOACK volatility limit of 22 percent. Volatility losses for the coming ILSAC GF-3 oils -- due on store shelves just after the turn of the century -- could quite possibly be limited to 15 percent for all grades.
When an oil suffers from high volatility, and the lighter molecules evaporate, the oil thickens gradually getting out of "spec" and adversely effecting the performance of the lubricant and placing the engine at risk."
If you read that carefully, you will see that it is what you just described as the reason that you look at flash points. Instead you should be looking at Noack Volitility. Flash points bear very little relationship to evaporative losses. They are used primarly for used oil analysis. Here is a link to an extended discription of flash point use:
http://www.practicingoilanalysis.com...up=Maintenance
Cary