GO FISHING, use SLABSAUCE Fishing Attractant
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Alignment question (long and involved)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    West Palm Beach, South Florida
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Alignment question (long and involved)

    Ok, some background first.

    I had a tire blowout about a year ago on the interstate. Got 2 new rear tires, have had a vibration since then, even though they've been rebalanced twice. Its in the seat, not the steering wheel (indicating a rear wheel problem), so I've assumed that I bent a rim when I had the blowout. Sucks, but not much I can do.

    So the vibrations been getting worse lately. I figured that either it has become unbalanced + bent from before, and thats why its worse. Decided to confirm it was the right rear and put the spare tire on to see if it goes away.

    I pulled the original tire off the car, and found the inside edge to be completely gone. This is a tire that is less than a year old. Checked the left side, it was almost as bad, but not quite.

    Here is a picture of the right rear tire.



    So here are my questions:

    Can you have a rear suspension alignment in this car? I didn't think you could, but I've been told so many things about alignments I don't know what to believe.

    If the answer is no, are there any suspension components that immediately come to mind when you see this? Off the top of my head, I'm thinking dog bones, but not sure.

    Basically, my plan is to go into Sears where I got the tires and ask for a rebalance. They will obviously notice that the rear tires are balding on the inside. Now, when I had the tires put on, I got a "free alignment check". Of course, I'm sure they didn't look at it, because I never got a printout or anything. They just said "its fine". At the time, I didn't really care, because it felt fine.

    Now, I know well enough that Sears will claim "I have bad alignment, its not their fault, I need to buy new tires".

    Help me prepare my argument to convince them that they should replace the tires under warranty. Its been less than a year, they supposedly checked the alignment when I had it in, and I got the road hazard warranty.

    Should I replace the dog bones in the rear so they don't try to claim I have a worn suspension?

    Thanks for the help everyone!
    93 525i / 01 330Ci / 98 Camry / 91 Volvo 240 / 99 Jeep GC

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    133

    Default

    as far as i know you can get a 4-wheel alignment and you should also check for worn or bent parts in the rear gl

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,839

    Default

    nope, no such thing as a 4 wheel alignment on the E34. Is your car lowered, if so this adds to the rear inner tire wear, this is normal but if lowered it gets worse.

    Putting new looking parts on the rear will void your warrantee which is road hazard, dont drive over any large parts at low speed to ruin the belts requiring a replacement under their warrantee

    If there are worn parts in the rear it can add to inner tire wear, I rotate front to rear as the fronts wear on the outsides normally.

    How many miles on them tires? if you put about 20-30k that wear would be normal even on a brand new E34.

    Hope this helps.


    Quote Originally Posted by diamond777
    as far as i know you can get a 4-wheel alignment and you should also check for worn or bent parts in the rear gl
    Last edited by 632 Regal; 03-29-2006 at 08:06 PM.
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,839

    Default

    Ohhh I believe the M5 has different arms for the rear, its a difft part number and is in a lowered E34, might be food for thought.
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    West Palm Beach, South Florida
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Gah! No, it doesnt!

    I mean, it does, thank you Jeff. What I meant was that it does not help that 20-30k miles is normal...

    You're right, they do tend to wear on the outsides on the front, so I suppose a rotation might have helped that. But I've only had them for about 13k miles!

    Oh, and the car is not lowered. I don't think I could intentionally damage the tire, but its not a bad thought.

    I thought there was no service interval for tire rotation on E34s? Not like that matters, the tire people at Sears are slightly more intelligent than Koko the gorilla. Gotta rotate the tires.........gotta rotate the tires.......thats all they say.
    93 525i / 01 330Ci / 98 Camry / 91 Volvo 240 / 99 Jeep GC

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    3,105

    Default There's a rear adjustable bushing kit

    out there, that is supposed to fix the rear.

    I thought your not supposed to rotate the tires on a BMW, they just want you to let wear inside rear/outside front.


    Vee ave vays of dealing vid your kind...........

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    West Palm Beach, South Florida
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Thats what I thought too. Unfortuantely, trying to tell that to a tire store is like talking to a broken record. They insist you have to rotate them. Doesn't matter if the car is a toyota, ford, BMW, staggered wheels...they insist you rotate them, and if you don't, then thats the cause of all problems.
    93 525i / 01 330Ci / 98 Camry / 91 Volvo 240 / 99 Jeep GC

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Benneton (United Colors of)
    Posts
    3,067

    Default

    i'm not bill r, and i'm too young to know that much about RWD, but i find that every "in the seat only" problem on my car turns out to be the driveshaft. you didn't say whether or not the problem went away, and ill be cloistered away studying for the math GRE for the next couple days (i'm not supposta be on teh intarweb right now ) but ill probably pop back in tomorrow morning to do some "serious math business" (involving this website) on the computer. i'd put my hand on the driveshaft tunnel and confirm that the vibration ISN"T coming from there. i used to drive about 1k/week in this car, now its down to around 500 mi or so, but even then, if a cheap set of chineese tires did that on the back wheels in 1 years time, i'd know it was because of major part deficiencies there. maybe i'm a p#ssy, but i would rather go after them for some pro-rating towards new tires, because i know that the situation wasn't entirely their fault (yes, i know you said that they told you it was ok, but that amount of wear in 1 year is due to some significant mechanical deficiencies in the car). i would be happy with a situation where they prorated me on the mileage the car had when it came in for the new tire, telling them that they weren't entirely blameless for that. perhaps you take it in initially, negotiate with them, and if their terms aren't amicable, you practice as much warranty fraud as you want/are willing to and take to another sears a tire that's too shredded for them to interpret.
    "..Torchinski v. Peterson that it is legal to carry a concealed weapon, so long the weapon is totally slick like a huge ass machine gun that you carry under a trench coat, like in the Matrix."


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,825

    Default

    lol. My fronts wear more on the inside. For some reason, I have a lot of front camber.

    www.KaRealtySF.com
    Build Date: 05-1995 /Engine: m50tu /Automatic Transmission /ABS /NO ASC /Open Differential /EAT Chip

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Eastern Tennessee USi
    Posts
    14,839

    Default

    BMW's reccomendation is to NOT rotate them but it adds up to replacing the rears 2:1.

    Back to the point of the vibration, its a bent rim (doubtful) or more likely an out of round tire, they can balance an egg but on the road you will feel it, I went through this with Discunt tire for over a year and 14 visits... usually felt at about 70 mph and above for an egg and below 20 mph.

    You could try to say that the vibration you complained about caused the unusual wear? Tires cost them about 20 bux each so you have a lot of leverage as long as there are a bunch of people in the waiting room.

    and people think all i do is post whore...


    Quote Originally Posted by DanDombrowski
    Thats what I thought too. Unfortuantely, trying to tell that to a tire store is like talking to a broken record. They insist you have to rotate them. Doesn't matter if the car is a toyota, ford, BMW, staggered wheels...they insist you rotate them, and if you don't, then thats the cause of all problems.
    95 E34 530I V2.37
    ===========
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. after lowering alignment question
    By markus in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-21-2007, 12:42 AM
  2. Tips and Question about Coolant Flush...(long winded)
    By GoldenEagleFan in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2006, 08:12 AM
  3. Yet another coolant bleeding question. (long)
    By Kristuphir in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 12:17 PM
  4. Long-shot question
    By Mitch90535im in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-27-2005, 04:45 PM
  5. E34 alignment question
    By Level8Drummer in forum 5 Series BMW
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2004, 12:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •